Feel free to email us at panehmiang@ymail.com.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Laporan Pusrawi Makan Tuan?

Fakta menarik tentang Dr Mohamed Osman Hamid iaitu doktor Myanmar yang bertugas di Hospital Pusrawi sejak setahun lalu itu, rupanya pernah bekerja selama 3 tahun di Regional Islamic Da'wah Council of South East Asia and the Pacific (RISEAP) antara tahun 1993 hingga 1995. Kebetulan pula, Brader Anwar Bin Ibrahim juga merupakan salah seorang ahli Supreme Council RISEAP yang secara kebetulan memegang jawatan pada tahun yang sama semasa Dr Mohamed Osman Hamid (individu yang mengeluarkan laporan Saiful tidak diliwat) bekerja di RISEAP. Bolehkah sesiapa menjelaskan hubungan Dr Mohamed Osman Hamid dengan Anwar Ibrahim, terutama semasa mereka berdua aktif di RISEAP pada awal tahun 1990an dan lewat tahun 1980an?

Amat sesuai Anwar dilebelkan sebagai Mr. Propaganda yang mempunyai ramai kawan berpengaruh termasuklah di IMF, Bank Dunia, Amerika Syarikat, World council of Mosques dan RISEAP.

Apa yang cuba diselindungi oleh Anwar? Adakah Wan Azizah melepaskan kerusi Parlimen Permatang Pauh hanya semata2 ingin memberi laluan kepada Anwar? Atau Wan Azizah sudah malas memikirkan mengenai penafian liwat Anwar? Benarkah Wan Azizah memberi 'restu' untuk Anwar membuat sidang akhbar bagi menyangkal dakwaan liwat berdasarkan laporan seorang doktor Hospital Pusrawi? Adakah Wan Azizah berasa malu apabila mengetahui bahawa doktor yang mengeluarkan laporan Saiful tidak diliwat itu adalah kenalan lama Anwar? Mungkinkah Anwar cuba memperdayakan rakyat Malaysia dengan menggunakan sahabatnya iaitu Dr. Mohamed Osman Hamid untuk mengeluarkan laporan perubatan palsu bahawa Saiful tidak diliwat?

Itulah Brader Anwar Bin Ibrahim yang seumpama seekor sesumpah yang suka mengambil kesempatan atas 'kesempitan'.

20 comments:

  1. copy from other blogJuly 31, 2008 at 7:36 PM

    We are reminding Najib and Mahathir about this, that Malaysia is not an Islamic state and it is not in a social contract.

    Malay Sakai, so please tell Badawi about it. Umno has always threatened the non-malays with riots and chaos. Nobody in Malaysia has started riots and chaos except for Umno.

    Umno has a deep rooted tradition of starting riots and chaos when every time they can't debate sensibly.

    The social contract is there alright and many do not question it. But is the social contract followed according to the spirit or hijacked to the benefit of a few?

    Just look at the number of huge projects that has failed is proof enough. Yet these are treated like normal - part of everyday happening.

    Gosh……….

    All the social contract talk does not hold any water, when you have people in power, namely Umno abusing their power. In fact, they are indirectly telling you, that they have the right to abuse the power. Is this fair? Of course it is unfair. You don't even need a social contract to tell you whether it is fair or not.

    Social contract didn't say that Malaysia is an Islamic state. On the contrary the social contract expressly stated that Malaysia was and is not an Islamic state.

    Now the deliberate misinterpretation, apparently accepted by Umno, is that Malaysia (including Sabah and Sarawak) is an Islamic state!

    Sabah and Sarawak would never have joined Malaysia if they had known that Malaysia will be deemed an Islamic state.

    If the social contract meant that the non-malays would merely exchange the British masters for the malay masters, they would never have agreed to join the malays for independence.

    What is the difference of having the British lording over the non-malays and having the malays doing the same to the non-malays! Probably worse. At least the British had some respect for fairness while the malays have none!

    So to get independence, the malays needed the non-malays. Without the non-malays agreement, the British would not have granted independence. So, is that not also part of the social contract? It is not a one-sided malay right. The malays would not be where they are without the non-malays.















    This country was all along a land for Orang Asli. The Chinese originated from China, Indians originated from India, malays originated from Indonesia etc. China get to give priority to the Chinese, India get to give priority to the Indians, and the malays are just freeloading from the Orang Asli land by claming it is bumi land.

    This is because they are doing what Allah said……….Allah told malays to come from Indonesia and steal the land from Orang Asli and use Orang Asli as slaves. So when is Malaysia giving priority to Orang Asli?

    The only time Malaysia is not a racist country is when an Orang Asli becomes the prime minister of Malaysia - which is never - it is a genocide in the name of Allah!

















    Bodoh punya melayu……….

    Baik balik ke tanah melayu la. We are natives of Sabah and Sarawak land - buat apa kamu punya orang datang sini menjajah kita oh?

    Kita tak suka kamu orang datang sini mengorek sumber petroleum tanah kita - this Sabah and Sarawak land not belongs to your malays.

    Get out from Sabah and Sarawak la!

    Bodoh melayu!
















    Then let me re-quote Lee Kuan Yew:

    Singaporean politician Lee Kuan Yew of the PAP, who publicly questioned the need for Article 153 in parliament, and called for a "Malaysian Malaysia".

    In a speech, Lee Kuan Yew bemoaned what would later be described as the Malaysian social contract:

    "According to history, malays began to migrate to Malaysia in noticeable numbers only about 700 years ago. Of the 39% malays in Malaysia today, about one-third are comparatively new immigrants like the secretary-general of Umno, Dato Syed Jaafar, who came to Malaya from Indonesia just before the war at the age of more than thirty. Therefore it is wrong and illogical for a particular racial group to think that they are more justified to be called Malaysians and that the others can become Malaysians only through their favour."

    Eventually, and Singapore became an independent nation in 1965, with Lee Kuan Yew as its first prime minister.



















    Really?

    So what about UK lands in the Peninsula? What was that called Tanah UK?

    And what about the 4 northern states that belonged to Thailand, that the Sultan groveled to the UK to take back? Tanah Thai?

    And previous to that all the lands owned by Portugal and Holland? Tanah Portugal and Holland?

    And how about the fiefdom of Raja Brooke in Borneo? Tanah Brooke?

    Each state may have had its own Sultan and government but that does not = Malaysia!

    If Malaysia was your own land to control then how come we had to have independence? I suppose Umno teach you that you have to declare independence from yourself?

    Stupidest thing I ever heard!

    You should go study Malaysia history, real Malaysia history not that doctored Umno garbage!


















    It is undeniable that malays are stupid, incapable and lazy. Why don't they just humbly admit the facts and repent and learn from other races especially Chinese?

    What is the point to argue here and wasting time again?

    From the first onwards we were merely telling the truths. It wasn't us who think that way but their own Badawi as well.

    All malays should go and read the newspaper, even Badawi is ashamed of maintaining the NEP after 34 years of implementing it and these malay baboons are still asking for it.

    Even Badawi wanted them to compete on a level playing field.

    So what does all these tell the world? It sends a very clear message that it is malays themselves who are incapable and lazy and they don't even want to admit it and make a change!

    That is the biggest shame of all.

    Can't you see, it is all back to square one. Year in, year out, some talk for half an hour, some one, some two. Some sing, many belt out their most recent released 'pantun'.

    After all. Malays are good at that. Suggestions after suggestions, some good, some impossible to realize.

    But, do you see any of these materialised? Hardly. Why, why and why???

    Because the malays can never change. Never! Why?

    The leaders forgot or were it they simply didn't want to address and admit that the actual disease is the malays and the remedy itself is also, the malays. They can never change. What is it about the malays?

    Firstly as you all know, they are a lazy species. Since the beginning of time they have been like that. Even the encyclopedia called them as lazy people. I think those British with their accent tried to call them 'malas', and if you put 'y' in, it becomes 'malays'.

    Embracing Islam make them a worse lot. Now they have a license to kill anything that gets into their way.

    Malays are ungrateful lot. In reality, they just can't live or open their minds for others. When Mahathir said that they are complacent, they put him in jail. When Mahathir encouraged them to learn English language, they got angry with him, saying it is a 'bahasa penjajah'.

    When other races 'maju', they got angry with them too. That was why at the end of Mahathir his regime, he said this, "I have achieved greatness as a prime minister, but I only fail in one thing, changing the malays."

    Well, nothing to be surprised about anyway since Mahathir is not really a malay, and I guess that was why the malays were angry with him.

    Drug abuse, hate, incest, liberal extremism (culture of miniskirts and gay marriages), murder, parochialism, racism, rape, religious fanaticism, snatch theft, spoilt-bratty behavior, tribalism, wife abuse, child abuse, all that is associated with the malay race.

    To them, malay is the biggest impediment towards building a truly Malaysian nation, and should be chucked into the dustbins of history.

    A genetically flawed race cannot be fixed by politically. Nature will take its course and globalization will put them out to pasture.

    What have we got now?

    Brain drain, economic disparity getting wider, poor education system, racial segregation, widespread corruption, inefficiency and uncompetitive on the government departments and others.

    Sad. Sad. Sad. The question asked by many of my fellow Chinese is this - Why can't you just tell the malay peoples to adopt Chinese culture which is superior?

    From research, this peninsular was part of the Siamese empire way before these malays from Indonesia invaded it.

    Still so thick skin, don't want to go back to Indonesia!















    It has nothing to do with Chinese. It has to do with malays versus the world.

    So what if all Chinese left Malaysia, malays still have to compete with the rest of world. Malays can still be "conquered" by foreigners. You cannot escape competition.

    Malays still have to learn how to live and work with the rest of world since Malaysia is a "small" country and has to trade with China and India.

    Why do Chinese want to conquer and control Malaysia? It is so small. Chinese wants to be global competitor. We do not want to be "Jaguh" Kampung.

    The choice lay with malays. Learn to compete or suffer the consequences. That is the universal value of the world.











    Part 1 - The origin of pendatang:

    · Malays - come from Indonesia and Yunnan.
    · Chinese - come from China.
    · Indians - come from India.

    Part 2 - Why they come to Malaysia:

    · Malays - easy life, food aplenty around those days, like fish from the river etc.
    · Chinese - looking for a living.
    · Indians - looking for a living and goes back.

    Part 3 - Pendatang's attitude:

    · Malays - the words 'relax la', 'bantuan kerajaan' and 'cukup makan' are their daily words.
    · Chinese - work, work and work but also spend.
    · Indians - work, earn and save but spend little.

    Looking at the mindsets of various pendatang. You tell me is it possible to be one Bangsa Malaysia? Never! For oil will never mix with water.

    If you tell the Chinese to close down Chinese schools, the children will not taught to be hardworking anymore, so they become lazy and can they ask for bantuan kerajaan?

    No! Right? So let the Chinese have more Chinese schools to teach the principle of hardworking, integrity, trustworthy etc, thus others can get more shares.

    Those days the government control the Chinese schools is because of communist. Now where got communist again? Bodoh!















    The Chinese are not in control of the economy at all. Consider this:

    Tenaga, Telekom, Proton, Petronas, Maybank, Genting accounts for more than 50% of the market capitalization of KLSE.

    So basically malays already control more than 50% of the economy.

    But problem is, only a few malays enjoy ownership of the economy and businesses while the rest are bleed dry. These people are millionaires and billionaires man. That is where the lies about the Chinese controlling the economy comes in, to keep themselves in that position.

    So the ordinary malays are angry because they feel the Chinese stole their money. The Chinese and Indians and others are angry because they feel they are further discriminated on top of discrimination.

    Non-malays on the other hand owned only 10% of such equity.

    People like the Robert Kuok group were so pissed that the government pressure them to sell their business, they shifted their headquarter to Hong Kong. But when we want the world to see that one of the richest tycoons is from Malaysia, when we want fame, we said Robert Kuok is from Malaysia, not knowing that he has long gone.

    What minister mentor Lee Kuan Yew has said is absolutely true. It is a simple fact. The Chinese and Indians have been marginalised since 1957, so what is new?

    While the Chinese have been economically strong, the Indians have been lagging behind, simply by being a minority race in Malaysia and by being led by a complete moron for the last three decades. What is Najib so upset about?

    Prove your worth as a race that can stand on theirs own two feet and succeed and you will have our respect. Until then, please just stop making a complete idiot of yourself and shut your gap.

    This goes for the entire Malaysia cabinet. You are all a disgrace and a bunch of corrupt hypocrites! Malaysia would have been much better off if it had remained a British colony. Only then would there have been equality.

    The malays are fall into the trap of other Umno malays should treat like shit in Malaysia. When we demand over basic rights, they always like to quote Singapore malays on not holding public position……….Please la, Singapore practise the real meritocracy, not the fake one like Malaysia.

    Do Singapore systematically marginalised the malays there, the answer is definitely no, do Singapore practise discrimination on education or limited their entry to university, do Singapore limited the critical field business license to the malays, do Singapore force the Singapore malays sold off their business to the Singapore Chinese, the answer is again a big NO.

    And this make Singapore malays stand high when compare to Malaysia malays.

    What make the Malaysian Chinese not happy is, we already being discriminated by our home country, when anything go wrong in Umno or in malay community, the Malaysian Chinese will be the target - for shooting or divert the attention to their own problems.

    Have you wondered why there are fewer Indians than malays in the general population in Singapore, that there are many more Indians than malays in high positions in politics, medicine, law, business, and many other fields that require talent and hard work in Singapore!

    In Malaysia, there are tongkat or crutches available, but in meritocratic Singapore, even the smaller minority Indians outperform the bigger minority malays.

    To Chinese, education is the most important thing to their next generation, so don't ask me why Chinese insist to have own stream of education until today.

    To tell you frankly, I feel much comfortable when I move to UK, after few years I know they will offer me citizenship being a professional here. And as far as I know, there isn't a classification on the citizenship, I will get equal treatment as others fairly.











    The culture of jealousy never die. Mahathir promoted the sense of jealousy of malays against non-malays to get into power.

    He promoted again jealousy of Malaysians, and malays in particular against the son in law of Badawi to throw Badawi out, so that his nominees can go in.

    Now it is generally accepted that jealousy between races has a legitimate claim to attention. Then NEP will not go way and Najib claimed that there cannot be a time limit for NEP.

    His father asked for 20 years, and he now says 200 years, until the country is taken over by foreign power, whichever is earlier.

    Let us not provide excuse to Umno.














    Badawi can formulate any policy. On the ground level where the heads are not qualified themselves as their staff - many problems will arise.

    Further the NEP will somehow make good brains frustrated and will certainly be the main causes of frustrations. At best we can get the second rate staff to stay - the top ones will have no problem seeking better salaries and futures elsewhere without the glass ceiling overhanging their heads.

    Our national sense of belonging will be lost when day in and day out we feel the impact of marginalisation in almost every sphere of educational or economic activities.

    I think we are in even more for hubs of abandoned projects because it is the brains that matters, not real estate buildings which politicians are only good at how to initiate to build for their own gains. When coming to real research and real productive work, you only have lots of unemployable graduates lining up to fill them.

    Best of luck Malaysia, while Malaysians of the best calibre are in our neighbouring countries creating state of art products and discoveries.

    The people with brains first go to Singapore, then Australia, then the US. Apparently roughly 2 million Malaysians have emigrated since the 1970s. Wow, what a brain drain that is……….

    S/he did the right thing by moving out of Malaysia. As long as is a Malaysian non-malay, you will be suppressed. They don't need scientists but more keris wielding morons to run the expensive labs.

    So anytime the experiment didn't work out, they can go straight and blame that the equipment is outdated. Anybody disputes their claim, they can take out the keris and showed their "power". Good for them. Malaysia is turning to a baboon infested country.

    Let alone those whose have already left. How about those who came back earlier with their foreign wives! The immigration department has made their renewal of visa a living hell, and they are not allowed to work no matter how qualified they may be. Eventually these "loyal Malaysians" also end up packing their bags and leave.

    The politicians can say one thing but it never gets implemented at the ground level. Look at the mess surrounding Malaysia "My Second Home" campaign - how many have actually come here and then left in deep frustration!

    The racists in Umno will also make certain that such policies will be doomed to fail. They would rather give citizenship to unruly and uneducated illegal Indonesians than some non-malay PhD holders.

    Get your children out of this sucking country before it is too late! This is a hopeless and dirty country with all the lousy ministers and corrupted politicians.

    I am afraid there is nothing second class citizens like us can do.

    Emigrate to other countries looks to be a better option. Of course, the exodus has started decades ago. In fact, Umno will be most happy to see us go (race ratio, you know what I mean).

    Umno does not depend on the second class citizens for the brains. They have the many universities in Bolehland to train their kind and churn out any number of experts you want. So brain drain is not a problem.









    Malaysia is slowly and surely turning into a very sick place. We must finish off Umno and its cronies to cure the country from this acute sickness.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Assalamualaikum...

    Tahniah ke atas Paneh & Co. di atas penghasilan blog ini. Tidak dinafikan....anda semua telah berjaya menghasilkan nukilan-nukilan sensasi tentang pergolakkan politik tanahair tercinta.

    Banyak yg anda semua cuba bongkarkan...mengajak pembaca untuk memikirkan nas-nas serta dalil-dalil yg dikemukan di dalam setiap isu yg dinukilkan.

    Secara umumnya, anda semua cuba untuk untuk memperjuangkan hak-hak ketuanan Melayu dan memartabatkan keagungan & kesucian Islam di tanah tumpah darah kita ini. Alhamdulillah....semoga anda komited & ikhlas di dalam perjuangan ini.

    Satu sahaja yg saya "tak setuju" - content yg dipaparkan di ruangan Laughter is the Best Medicine adalah tidak secocok & tak kena pada tempat dan masanya. Di ketika kita cuba membincangkan isu-isu yg penting & kritikal ini, perlukan kita menyajikan para pembaca dgn cerita-cerita berunsur seks & lucah tersebut. Sudah lama saya perhatikan perkara ini, dan didapati makin lama makin mengarut kandungan yg dipaparkan. Tidak dinafikan memang hidup memerlukan sedikit jenaka, tetapi jenaka yg semacam inikah yg kita perlukan???

    Jika diselidiki sirah Rasulullah SAW dan kisah para sahabatnya, banyak cerita-cerita yg boleh diambil pengajaran. Jika mahu memaparkan sesuatu yg bersifat jenaka, banyak lagi kisah-kisah lucu yg boleh dikongsi bersama. TIDAK PERLU UNTUK BERGELAK KETAWA DENGAN CERITA YG BERUNSUR SEBEGINI!!!

    Memang generasi dulu menganggap cerita sebegini sebagai sesuatu yg "normal". Itu Melayu-Islam dahulu. Selaras dgn anjakan paradigma yg kununya telah dilakukan oleh pemimpin-pemimpin kita, "citarasa" kita juga perlu berubah dan diubah. Tak usah bercakap pasal maruah & Islam, jika pemikiran kita masih berada di takuk lama!

    Semoga secebis pandangan ini akan dapat diberikan perhatian oleh Paneh & Co.

    ReplyDelete
  3. lebih baik anwar lah dari si saifool al juburi tu..tak muncul2

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mr copy from other blog is making pure judgement based on emotions and not facts.I think that Mr Copy has an inferiority complex and make statements just to appease himself. I am proud to be a malay, full stop

    ReplyDelete
  5. Terima Kasih kepada Fikir Sejenak atas cadangan dan sokongan beliau. InsyaAllah warga Paneh Miang akan membaiki segala kekurangan dari semasa ke semasa. Terima kasih juga kami ucapkan kepada semua yang tidak putus2 memberi sokongan terhadap blog ini sama ada berbentuk pandangan, kritikan, pujian dan sebagainya. Segala sokongan anda kami ucapkan ribuan terima kasih yang tidak terhingga.

    p/s: Tiada siapa ke nak beri pandangan berkenaan artikel ini?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kalau ngko nak tanya pandangan semua org2 bhg legal, sure kata laporan tu tak kuat... Dia bukan dr kalangan doktor pakar, siasatan hanya untuk umum (general) dan bukan kes liwat secara khusus. Tambahan pula ada hubungkait dgn Brader Anwar Bin Ibrahim satu ketika dulu... semuanya lemah.

    Di satu pihak yang lain, menyokong DSAI atau penentang Gomen akan terus-terusan mempercayai laporan tersebut, sebab GH adalah hospital Gomen. Laporan pun dah dibuat dulu. Benar atau tidak, atau apa keputusan laporan GH tidak akan dipandang oleh penyokong kuat DSAI kerana bg mereka pemimpin mereka tidak sekali2 akan membuat salah khususnya liwat. Kebenaran bagi mereka adalah apa yang dicakapkan oleh pihak mereka, dan bukannya melalui bukti atau keputusan/penentu antara betul atau salah.

    Tu je aku nak cakap... Adios!

    -M6

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hukum Allah yang sebenar benarnya...baliklah semula kepada undang2 Ajaran Islam..buktikan kebenaran kalau betul diliwat!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Salam,

    luar topik sikit yer...

    terbaca di satu blog lain, penulis tu kata best juga KALAU, diulang KALAU Tun Dr. M bertanding bebas di Permatang Pauh...

    Sekian...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Byk pandangan berkenaan saksi kes liwat ni... Memandangkan bro Anwar dh bawak kes dia ke mahkamah syariah, so lebih baik mahkamah yg tentukan. Kecuali yg akan jadik isu berkenaan bidangkuasa mahkamah syariah & sivil (Artikel 121(1)) akan digunapakai.

    Tun M bertanding? Nak ke dia? Dah keluar UMNO so dia nk bertanding atas tiket apa? Aku tak pikir pucuk pimpinan UMNO/BN akan setuju, walaupun menarik & mungkin sengit gak nnt.

    -M6

    ReplyDelete
  10. tp aku tak dpt bygkn la,,mcm mana boleh dorg nk timbulkan kesan liwat tu,, mau
    cucuk ngan timun ka,,ngan terung ka,,perghhh konfom sakit,,
    pastu sayfool ckp
    "xpa demi tuhan, ugama dan negara tercinta,,sye sanggup,,,cucuk,,"

    kalu
    difikirkan mgunakan AKAL YG SIHAT byk benda yg menimbulkan keraguan n
    pertyaan:
    1.org tua DSAI tu dah ada isterii kenapa nk main buntut,,
    2.DSAI da la
    sakit belakng,,mau patah balik kalo meliwat org
    3.kenyataan hospital
    PUSRAWI
    4.SAYFOOL yg xmelawan
    5.kenapa jumpa najib org politik,,kenapa xjumpa
    paklah,,or imam negara ke
    6.kenapa selepas 8 kali,,kali pertama xsakit ke
    7.kena
    liwat selalunya trauma berdepan masyrakat, ni siap buat blog lagi

    ReplyDelete
  11. Saiful ni seorang
    gay yang gila glamour, kalau buat report kena liwat atau berliwat dengan gay
    lain tak dapat glamour, cara senang tuduh DSAI terus popular dan mungkin dapat
    imbuhan dari UMNO.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Saiful Bukhari Melihat kembali laman web Saiful Bukhari jelas rata-rata komen tidak menyebelahi beliau. Komen terdiri dari beberapa komen yang memberi sokongan kepada Saiful, berpuluh yang menentang Saiful dan ada yang mengatakan bahawa Saiful sememang terdiri dari spesies yang cenderung kepada lelaki. Antara komen yang tidak mempercayai dakwaan Saiful adalah kerana timbulnya laporan liwat doktor PUSRAWI dan kerana setelah 8 kali di liwat baru bertindak melaporkan kepada polis dan pertemuan dengan Najib.

    Melihat kepada apa yang ada – sentimen yang ada - konklusi awal bahawa Saiful menipu menjadi pilihan pelayar laman beliau. Di lihat dari segi “posting” di blog beliau jelas pelayar yang ada tidak mempercayai Anwar Ibrhaim meliwat Saiful. Gambar Saiful ada dalam laman www.malaysiakini.com. kita melihat semangat anak muda yang mengatakan beliau di liwat dan mahu mendedahkan kerana ALLAH, Bangsa dan Agama.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Kita ambil kira macam mana kalau dua2 pihak adalah benar...

    1. Saiful tak melawan walaupun dia disuntut byk kali - Memang dia nak kenakan di Anwar;

    2. Dakwaan (bukan fakta) bhw perkara ni adalah benar konspirasi pihak2 tertentu - Ada beberapa perkara yg masih belum jelas, dan pihak polis tidak mendedahkan laporan siasatan, mungkin di mahkamah nanti.

    3. Kenyataan Saiful menggunakan nama Tuhan, bertindak atas sebab agama, bangsa dan negara - mungkin benar walaupun Saiful nak kenakan si Anwar ttp Anwar memang telah meliwat beliau, dan bukti2 tersebut akan dibawa ke mahkamah kelak.

    * Alaaa susah sangat, bermubahalah je laa ngkorang! Kitorang plak yg sakit kepala pikirkan kes dlm selimut ngkorang!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Kenapa takut sgt masing2 nak mubahalah? Saiful guna nama Tuhan, bangsa dan negara tapi Mubahalah ni lain, ada cara2 dan prosedur udari pihak yang menuntut dan dituntut (juga disuntut).

    Anwar pun satu, dari dulu lg kenapa laa ngko tak pernah bersumpah pasal kes liwat ngko? Sekarang dtg satu lg tuntutan, kenapa tak berani ka?

    ReplyDelete
  15. KALAU SESORANG YG MEMANG MEROMPAK KEMUDIAN MELAKUKAN SUMPAH DGN LAKNAT MENGAKU TAK MELAKUKAN ROMPAKAN... ADAKAH MASALAH SELESAI?

    SI SEPOL NI PON SATU, KALAU DAH 8KALI KENA LIWAT NGAN BRO ANWAR, KENAPA SUSAH SANGAT NAK PASNG PERANGKAP JAWI KE, MUFTI KE, PEKIDA KE, SURUH BUAT AMBUSH MASA ADA KAT BILIK NGAN BRO ANWAR....
    25 HB DIA JUMPA NAJIB, CAKAP 8 KALI KENA LIWAT, THEN 28HB DIA BUAT LAPORAN POLIS KATA 9 KALI KENA LIWAT (TERBARU PADA 26HB)...

    ADAKAH SEPOL NI BENAR2 SENGAL?
    TAKKAN TAK BOLEH BUAT PERANGKAP BRO ANWAR?

    ORG2 UMNO YG TAK TERBUKA FIKIRAN TOLONG JANGAN JAWAB...

    ReplyDelete
  16. Bro, sori tp aku tk brp suka statement ngko yg kalau tk mengaku sumpah tu masalah mungkin tk selesai... Tu hukum Tuhan dh tentukan, sape plak kita nk pertikaikan sedangkan sumpah Wallahi Wabillahi Watallahi, dengan sumpah laknat mmg ada di dalam hukum syariah? Kalau org nk menipu psl hal ni, atau kes lain psl akidah masing2 ke, itu antara dia dgn Tuhan. Buleh baca ulasan Ustaz Asri psl hal ni. Mengucap cepat bro...

    p/s: Jgn psl hal org lain kita memperjudikan akidah & iman kpd Tuhan.

    ReplyDelete
  17. kesilapan saiful, gagal membawa 4 saksi, sedangkan beliau mempunyai masa yg panjang utk membawa saksi2, tambahan pula dgn zaman teknologi, mungkin ketika bro anwar meliwat dia,sidalam bilik, beliau mungkin boleh ketandas sebentar dan menghantar sms kepada jawi ke, pekida ke atau kawan2 kolej lama beliau....
    mungkin saiful tertekan ketika diliwat agaknya, sampai x sempat membuat apa2 tindakan, atau mungkin beliau ada bukti2 lain ketika dimahkamah (mungkin telah membuat perkara2 diatas....)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Bukti: 10 Dalil Penyelewengan Dakwan Kes Liwat Anwar !
    Penyiasatan dan pendakwaan ke atas Anwar Ibrahim telah menimbulkan pelbagai persepsi dan spekulasi. Meskipun Anwar Ibrahim belum di dakwa secara rasmi di mahkamah, terdapat pelbagai kepincangan dalam siasatan dan dalam perjalanan kes ini. Berikut ialah 10 perkara misteri dan luar biasa yang timbul dalam kes Anwar.

    1. Laporan Pengadu enggan diserahkan Ini merupakan satu perkara yang luar biasa. Lazimnya, apabila seseorang yang dituduh dengan sesuatu kesalahan meminta laporan polis yang dibuat oleh pengadu, ianya akan dibekalkan dalam masa seminggu ke dua minggu oleh pihak polis. Tanpa laporan pengadu, orang yang tertuduh sukar membela diri kerana apa yang didakwa pun tentulah tidak jelas. Pengalaman penulis memohon laporan polis bagi membela anak guam membuatkan penulis hairan kerana penulis pernah beberapa kali mendapat laporan pengadu pada pagi yang sama penulis memohon. Kenyataan Hamid Albar bahawa laporan enggan diberi kerana pendakwaan belum dimulakan secara rasmi tidak masuk akal kerana masyarakat maklum Anwar telah ditahan oleh polis, keterangannya telah diambil dan beliau perlu membela diri dan reputasinya. Ini meyakinkan masyarakat bahawa laporan polis belum ada dan perbincangan sedang dibuat berhubung inti laporan tersebut untuk mendapatkan tarikh dakwaan yang paling sesuai.

    2. Anwar ditangkap sebelum tempoh Adalah sesuatu yang cukup memalukan apabila pihak polis memungkiri janji dan menangkap Anwar sebelum tempoh yang diberikan tamat. Tempoh diberi sehingga pukul 2 petang tetapi Anwar ditangkap sekitar pukul 1 petang. Mungkin polis terbawa-bawa sikap Pak Lah yang kerap membuat kenyataan palsu.

    3. Anwar disabitkan bersalah sebelum dibicarakan Apabila Pak lah diminta mengulas berhubung kes Anwar, Pak Lah dengan segera berkata bahawa memanglah penjenayah akan menafikan kesalahannya. Belum pun perbicaraan bermula, Anwar sudah disabitkan sebagai pesalah oleh Pak Lah. Pada masa yang sama, apabila Pak Lah diminta mengulas berhubung dakwaan ke atas najib dan Rosmah, Pak Lah dengan segera menyatakan bahawa Pak Lah berkeyakinan penuh bahawa Najib dan Rosmah tidak bersalah. Jika Mahathir dikaitkan dengan konspirasi perlantikan hakim, pak Lah selangkah ke hadapan dengan melantik dirinya sebagai hakim tidak rasmi.

    4. DNA baru Anwar diminta oleh Pak Lah dan Khairi. DNA Anwar sudah lama dimiliki oleh pihak polis berikutan siasatan kes lamanya. Paten DNA tidak akan berubah. Justeru DNA baru tidak diperlukan melainkan jika hendak digunakan sebagai bukti palsu yang hendak dicalit dibadan pengadu. Tindakan Khairi dan Pak Lah yang berulangkali menuntut Anwar memberi DNA barunya menimbulkan tanda tanya berhubung tujuan mereka. Apabila Anwar mendedahkan perkara ini di dalam muka depan Suara Keadilan, Pak LAh dan Khairi diam membisu. Kalau anak dara yang diam, ini bermakna anak dara tersebut setuju dengan pinangan. Justeru, diamnya Pak LAh dan Khairi seakan mengiyakan persepsi masyarakat bahawa inilah tujuannya.

    5. Laporan Pusrawi Perlu diakui bahawa laporan Pusrawi sebelum ini bukanlah laporan rasmi bagi kes Anwar. Meskipun begitu, fakta bahawa seorang doktor, meskipun bukan doktor pakar kes liwat, telah melihat lubang punggung Saiful dan tiada sebarang kesan koyakan atau apa-apa tanda diliwat adalah relevan. Meminjam istilah yang selalu digunakan di dalam kes-kes berkaitan Puspakom, pemeriksaan yang dibuat adalah pemeriksaan mata kasar. Meskipun begitu, ianya tetap relevan dan keterangan sudah cukup untuk menimbulkan keraguan munasabah. Pejabat Peguam Negara selama ini tidak membuat pendakwaan melainkan yakin dengan tahap 90% bahawa tertuduh memang bersalah dan bukti-bukti yang ada benar-benar kuat.

    6. Bukti alibi Anwar memadai Kepincangan dalam kes ini semakin menjadi-jadi apabila pihak polis berkeras meminta DNA baru Anwar sedangkan bukti alibi Anwar tidak dikaji. Sepatutnya, polis menyerahkan laporan Saiful kepada Anwar supaya Anwar boleh membela diri dengan menjelaskan di mana Anwar berada pada tarikh yang didakwa Saiful berlaku liwat tersebut. Seterusnya, alibi Anwar perlu disiasat. Sebagai contoh, Antihusam (blogger UMNO) mendakwa punggungnya telah saya liwat pada pukul 11 malam , 20 Julai 2008 di Hotel Sunway. Saya akan memaklumkan bukti alibi saya pada waktu itu. Contohnya, saya menyatakan bahawa pada waktu tersebut, saya menghadiri ceramah Ustaz Hadi di markas Pas. Terdapat lebih 20 kawan saya yang boleh membuktikan kehadiran saya. Justeru, mustahil saya meliwat Antihusam. Apabila pihak polis selesai menyoal alibi-alibi saya dan berpuas hati bahawa saya mustahil meliwat Antihusam, siasatan patut ditamatkan. Begitulah juga dalam kes Anwar. Tindakan pihak polis yang beria-ia mahukan DNA baru Anwar kelihatan senada dengan Pak Lah dan Khairi.

    7. Pendakwaan oleh Pejabat Peguam Negara UMNO ke sana ke sini membuat kenyataan bahawa kes Anwar tidak akan diuruskan oleh Pejabat Peguam Negara kerana Peguam Negara sendiri sedang disiasat berhubung dakwaan rasuah dan penyelewengan kuasa yang dibuat oleh Anwar. Pendakwaan, jika jadi, akan dibuat oleh Peguam Cara Negara. Masyarakat sedia maklum bahawa pendakwaan masih akan diteruskan oleh Pejabat Peguam Negara sekalipun diketuai oleh Peguam Cara Negara. Adalah pelik bin ajaib untuk mendakwa Pejabat Peguam Negara tidak akan dipengaruhi oleh Peguam Negara. Nama pun Pejabat Peguam Negara.

    8. Laporan HKL Timbul isu terbaru bahawa laporan rasmi HKL turut bocor dan laporan tersebut menyatakan bahawa Saiful memang tiada tanda-tanda diliwat dan mustahil Saiful diliwat. Ini menunjukkan Saiful tidak ikhlas membantu BN. Sekiranya Saiful komited membantu BN, Saiful sepatutnya pergi ke Lorong Haji Taib dan menyuruh pondan-pondan di situ meliwatnya beberapa kali agar kesan liwat ketara. Ini menunjukkan perancangan lemah BN dan ketidak ikhlasan Saiful dalam membantu BN.

    9. Isu motif dan tujuan Kes ini menimbulkan keraguan yang cukup banyak apabila kepimpinan UMNO seperti Najib mengakui telah berjumpa dengan Saiful sebelum saiful membuat laporan polis. Adalah menjadi pengetahuan umum bahawa Anwar adalah musuh politik UMNO. Justeru, polis sepatutnya menyiasat kebarangkalian berlakunya konspirasi dikalangan UMNO untuk menganiayai Anwar seperti yang pernah dibuat sebelum ini. Sebelum ini, mahkamah telahpun membebaskan Anwar dari tuduhan liway yang dijaja oleh UMNO berdasarkan sekeping surat layang.

    10. Terlampau banyak percanggahan fakta kes oleh BN Pada mulanya, Najib mendakwa tidak pernah berjumpa Saiful. Kemudian, Najib mendakwa pula bahawa najib pernah berjumpa Saiful 2 bulan dulu di pejabat untuk membincangkan biasiswa. Kemudian, Najib berkata pula bahawa Najib telah berjumpa Saiful 2 hari sebelum laporan polis dibuat untuk membincangkan biasiswa. Tiba-tiba, Najib mendakwa pula Najib telah memegang tangan Saiful yang kesejukan 2 hari sebelum laporan polis dibuat di rumah Najib sendiri apabila Saiful yang kononnya ketakutan datang mengadu diliwat.

    Saiful pula mulanya mendakwa diliwat pada 26 haribulan di sebuah kondo di Malaysia. Apabila Anwar kelihatan mempunyai bukti alibi yang kukuh, saiful menjadi terdesak. Kemudian, Saiful menyatakan pula bahawa dia telah 3 kali menemani rombongan Anwar ke luar negara dengan memberi "hint" bahawa dia kononnya telah diliwat-liwat di luar negara beberapa kali. Ini menimbulkan pelbagai tanda Tanya. Mengapa seorang lelaki yang kelihatan tinggi dan sihat seperti Saiful membiarkan dirinya diliwat-liwat beberapa kali dan terus menemani Anwar ke mana saja. Sebagai contoh, jika saya diliwat oleh sesiapa, saya akan trauma dan akan segera menjauhkan diri dari orang tersebut.

    Selain itu, Saiful juga sentiasa kelihatan ceria. Demi Allah, selama saya bekerja sebagai peguam, belum pernah saya menemui mangsa rogol atau mangsa liwat yang begitu ceria. Mangsa kes serangan seksual akan trauma, malu dengan masyarakat, rasa rendah diri dan biasanya mengalami kemurungan.

    Saiful juga seorang lelaki. Tidak semudah itu hendak menembusi lubang punggung seorang lelaki. Asalkan saiful mengeraskan punggungnya, mustahil Anwar dapat meliwatnya. Sekiranya Saiful benar-benar hendak diliwat, dua atau tiga orang lelaki gagah diperlukan untuk memegang Saiful dan lubang punggung saiful perlu disapu minyak terlebih dahulu sebelum diliwat. Sekiranya ini yang berlaku, mustahil Saiful akan terus mengikut Anwar ke sana sini sehinggalah menemani rombongan Anwar ke luar negara sebanyak 3 kali.

    Sebagai kesimpulan, kes Anwar Ibrahim ini tidak layak dibawa ke mahkamah untuk pendakwaan. Sekiranya saya ialah hakim bagi kes tersebut, saya akan melempar fail pendakwaan ke lantai kerana terlalu banyak kepincangan.

    ARTIKEL DIATAS DIPETIK DARI: cucumatkilau.blogdrive.com

    ReplyDelete
  19. nama yang tak tersebutAugust 15, 2008 at 2:55 AM

    kita tunggu je bicara mahkamah. kebenaran akan terserlah jua.

    ReplyDelete

Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayat 120

"Bukan orang Yahudi, ataupun Nasrani yang akan menerimamu, melainkan jika kamu mengikut agama mereka. Katakan,"Hanya petunjuk Allah sahaja yang benar" Jika kamu menyetujui kehendak mereka, setelah kamu menerima ilmu pengetahuan, kamu akan dapati tidak ada satu perjanjian ataupun penyokong dapat menolongmu dari Allah."

Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayat 216

"Kamu diwajibkan berperang (untuk menentang pencerobohan) sedang peperangan itu ialah perkara yang kamu benci; dan boleh jadi kamu benci kepada sesuatu padahal ia baik bagi kamu, dan boleh jadi kamu suka kepada sesuatu padahal ia buruk bagi kamu. Dan (ingatlah), Allah jualah Yang mengetahui (semuanya itu), sedang kamu tidak mengetahuinya."

Surah Al-Imran, Ayat 28

"Janganlah orang-orang yang beriman mengambil orang- orang kafir menjadi teman rapat dengan meninggalkan orang-orang yang beriman. Dan sesiapa yang melakukan (larangan) yang demikian maka tiadalah ia (mendapat perlindungan) dari Allah dalam sesuatu apapun, kecuali kamu hendak menjaga diri daripada sesuatu bahaya yang ditakuti dari pihak mereka (yang kafir itu). Dan Allah perintahkan supaya kamu beringat-ingat terhadap kekuasaan diriNya (menyeksa kamu). Dan kepada Allah jualah tempat kembali."

Surah Al-An'aam, Ayat 67

"Tiap-tiap khabar berita mempunyai masa yang menentukannya (yang membuktikan benarnya atau dustanya); dan kamu akan mengetahuinya."

Surah Ar-Ra'd, Ayat 11

"Bagi tiap-tiap seorang ada malaikat penjaganya silih berganti dari hadapannya dan dari belakangnya, yang mengawas dan menjaganya (dari sesuatu bahaya) dengan perintah Allah. Sesungguhnya Allah tidak mengubah apa yang ada pada sesuatu kaum sehingga mereka mengubah apa yang ada pada diri mereka sendiri. Dan apabila Allah menghendaki untuk menimpakan kepada sesuatu kaum bala bencana (disebabkan kesalahan mereka sendiri), maka tiada sesiapapun yang dapat menolak atau menahan apa yang ditetapkanNya itu, dan tidak ada sesiapapun yang dapat menolong dan melindungi mereka selain daripadaNya."

Blog Archive